A significant political slugfest erupted over the Nagpur Violence Controversy, leaving over 30 people injured. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis stated that the violence was premeditated. Meanwhile, the Opposition accused the government of failing to maintain order. Former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray criticized the double-engine government in Maharashtra, calling for their resignation.
In response to the unfolding chaos, authorities imposed a curfew in several areas of Nagpur after violence erupted on Monday evening. This unrest stemmed from a call to relocate the tomb of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb out of Maharashtra.
Clashes and Arrests in Nagpur
Authorities reported that over 60 rioters were arrested, and approximately 30 vehicles were set ablaze during a massive clash between two groups in the Mahal area. The unrest reflects deep-rooted tensions within the community.
Maharashtra Chief Minister Fadnavis addressed the Assembly regarding the Nagpur Violence Controversy. He indicated that protests organized by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and Bajrang Dal involved the spreading of rumors about religious items being burned. “It looks like a well-planned attack. No one has permission to take law and order into their hands,” he asserted. Fadnavis also emphasized that attacks on police would not be tolerated, promising strict action against the perpetrators.
Claims of Conspiracy by State Leaders
Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde echoed Fadnavis’ sentiments, labeling the violence a “planned conspiracy.” He remarked, “Such a brutal incident has never been witnessed before. The protestors are protesting for the pride of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj.” Shinde urged those supporting Aurangzeb to reflect on history and consider the narrative presented in the movie ‘Chhava’.
Opposition Criticism of Government Response
Uddhav Thackeray pointed fingers at the Mahayuti government, which includes the BJP, Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena, and Ajit Pawar’s NCP. He stated, “I am not the Chief Minister, nor am I the Home Minister. Ask the Chief Minister (Devendra Fadnavis) who is behind this.” Thackeray highlighted the presence of the RSS headquarters in Nagpur as a factor in the unrest.
Congress leader Renuka Chowdhury also raised concerns in the Rajya Sabha about the “complete breakdown of communal harmony and law and order” in Nagpur. She noted, “In its 300 years of dynamic existence, Nagpur has never experienced riots.”
The Broader Implications of the Nagpur Violence Controversy
The Nagpur Violence Controversy raises critical questions about governance, communal harmony, and the socio-political landscape of Maharashtra. Critics, including Sena (UBT) leader Chaturvedi, argue that the government is instigating violence to divert attention from pressing issues such as financial instability, joblessness, and farmer suicides.
The unrest in Nagpur highlights the urgent need for dialogue and resolution in Maharashtra. As the state grapples with these challenges, citizens hope for effective leadership that prioritizes peace and stability.
For more updates, visit The Hans Bharat.
